Consistent spatial lesion-symptom patterns: A comprehensive analysis using triangulation in lesion-symptom mapping in a cohort of stroke patients.

INTRODUCTION: The relationship between brain lesions and stroke outcomes is crucial for advancing patient prognosis and developing effective therapies. Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and it is important to understand the neurological basis of its varied symptomatology. Lesion-symptom mapping (LSM) methods provide a means to identify brain areas that are strongly associated with specific symptoms. However, inner variations in LSM methods can yield different results. To address this, our study aimed to characterize the lesion-symptom mapping variability using three different LSM methods. Specifically, we sought to determine a lesion symptom core across LSM approaches enhancing the robustness of the analysis and removing potential spatial bias. MATERIAL & METHODS: A cohort consisting of 35 patients with either right- or left-sided middle cerebral artery strokes were enrolled and evaluated using the NIHSS at 24 h post-stroke. Anatomical T1w MRI scans were also obtained 24 h post-stroke. Lesion masks were segmented manually and three distinctive LSM methods were implemented: ROI correlation-based, univariate, and multivariate approaches. RESULTS: The results of the LSM analyses showed substantial spatial differences in the extension of each of the three lesion maps. However, upon overlaying all three lesion-symptom maps, a consistent lesion core emerged, corresponding to the territory associated with elevated NIHSS scores. This finding not only enhances the spatial accuracy of the lesion map but also underscores its clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the significance of exploring complementary LSM approaches to investigate the association between brain lesions and stroke outcomes. By utilizing multiple methods, we can increase the robustness of our results, effectively addressing and neutralizing potential spatial bias introduced by each individual method. Such an approach holds promise for enhancing our understanding of stroke pathophysiology and optimizing patient care strategies.

Safety, Feasibility, and Acceptability of a New Virtual Rehabilitation Platform: A Supervised Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults worldwide, with hemiparesis being the most prevalent consequence. The use of video games and movement sensors could contribute to improving patients' chances of recovery. We performed a supervised pilot study to validate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a new virtual rehabilitation platform in patients with chronic post-stroke upper limb hemiparesis. METHODS: The participants (n = 9) participated in 40 rehabilitation sessions, twice a week, for a period of 20 weeks. Their experiences with the platform were documented using a Likert-scale survey. Changes in motor function were evaluated using the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI) and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All participants expressed that they enjoyed the experience and felt comfortable using the platform. Preliminary results showed significant motor recovery (P = .0039) according to the WMFT scores. Patients with significant impairment showed no improvement in upper limb task-oriented motor function after therapy.The new platform is safe and well-accepted by patients. The improvement in motor function observed in some of the participants should be attributed to the therapy since spontaneous functional recovery is not expected in chronic stroke patients.